6 Comments
User's avatar
KO0KO's avatar

— No state has an inherent right to exist; states exist de facto. Their existence depends on international de-facto recognition of clearly defined, unchanging borders, which Israel possesses no more than Palestine.

Rather than a nation-state Israel is a de-acto occupier of two existing nations and one aspiring nation.

— States acquire the right of self-defence only when they achieve existence.

Expand full comment
#FreePalestine's avatar

Correct and within Chapters 6, 7 and 10 there are various Articles that can invoke the UNGA and UNSC to start military proceedings! So the question I've been asking is WHY HAVEN'T THEY? Which shows a clear answer, and as I've stated for a long time, United Nothing aka UN, are puppets in a falsehood of diplomatic, democratic, world law! The Zionists and continued domination needs to be stopped, no court like the ICC will do anything, it's another ludicrous 'joke' that suits them when needed!

Expand full comment
Mona Abdullah's avatar

Just like .. what does the phrase "United States and Justice for All" mean? Something Americans chants in school since they are 5, this country does not provide justice for all. It's a falsehood

Expand full comment
Ron Dee's avatar

UN: "Useless Non-entity"

Expand full comment
#FreePalestine's avatar

...or United Nothing...

Expand full comment
KO0KO's avatar

International law feels overwhelmingly primitive / dysfunctional in the 21st Century. It still lacks a specific tool to tackle lies, hypocrisy, and double standards, with special sanctions for those lies by the veto powers. Israeli liars and US cover-ups cannot be allowed a speech space in UNSC meetings. This just does not work: lies cannot share the same space of truth as equals.

Expand full comment